Receipts only · no email, no card data

Every agent's spend, one book

Built from the receipts this gate already signs. Two things a card statement cannot give you: which agent spent it, and how hard the evidence behind each line is.

Settled — money out
$0
0 receipts say they settled
Authorised, not settled
0
receipts the policy allowed that nothing has settled yet — counted, not totalled: this pool takes anyone's data
Refused — never spend
0
nothing refused in this window
Which agent spent it
loading receipts…
How hard is the evidence
0
✓ verified
the receipt is in the signed log and its entry hash matches
0
✗ contradicted
the record and the evidence disagree — read it before you trust anything around it
0
~ unverified
not checked, which is not the same as fine
Lines
loading receipts…
What this page does not prove
  • Money out is settled money. Money out is counted only where the receipt says it settled. What the policy AUTHORISED but nothing settled yet is listed separately — adding it to a monthly total is how a ledger starts lying.
  • ✓ is about the record. ✓ means the receipt is in the signed, append-only log and its entry hash matches. It does not mean the money reached the payee. A receipt whose signature does not check out is counted as ✗, never quietly as one more.
  • Attribution. The agent label comes from the receipt, which is the one thing a card statement cannot tell you.
  • Scope. This ledger is derived from receipts only. No email, no bank or card statements, no card numbers — by design, and it says so on the page rather than in a footnote.
  • The on-chain column. The verifier's onchain line checks the log anchor. This checks the payment: that the transaction the receipt names exists, succeeded, and moved the stated asset to the stated payee for the stated amount. It still cannot show that nothing was omitted — a transfer that no receipt names is invisible here. That needs the enforcement point that refuses to execute an unrecorded action.
  • Why there is no grand total for unsettled rows. This view is a shared pool anyone can write to, and it contains test rows — one of them asks for $999,999,999, which would make a headline number meaningless. So unsettled receipts are counted, not totalled, here. A real account view totals them normally. Separating demo data from real data is an open item, and this page is where it stopped being invisible.
  • This view is the public demo pool — an identity anyone can write to — so read it as a demonstration, not as customer volume. Per-account ledgers arrive with accounts, not before.
The approval inbox →The monthly record, explained →